Dynamic Alpha Macro Fund (DYMIX): March 2025 Overview

peRFORMANCE METRICS

* Gross Expense Ratio is 2.00%.  Net Expense Ratio is 1.98%.
* Fund inception was 7/31/2023.
Performance data shown represents past performance and is not a guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted. Updated performance information and daily net asset value per share (“NAV”) is available at no cost by calling toll-free 1-833-462-6344.

A pie chart titled "Overall Strategy Allocation" illustrating the Dynamic Alpha Macro Fund's portfolio breakdown as of March 2025. The chart shows allocations with 48.7% in Global Macro, 19.3% in Dividend Equities, 18.7% in Growth Equities, 10.4% in Core Equities, and 2.9% in Cash. This visual highlights the fund's concentrated, classic discretionary global macro strategy with a significant emphasis on Global Macro positions. The balanced allocation reflects Dynamic Alpha Macro Fund's commitment to proactive risk management, return generation, and dynamic alpha through a combination of strategic equities, Treasury notes, and commodities exposure. Dynamic Wealth Group posted this image. Visit https://www.DynamicWG.com.

This Month’s Performance

March highlighted the strengths of our discretionary global macro strategy within the Dynamic Alpha Macro Fund (DYMIX), providing another strong month of outperformance, as noted above. Our dual-strategy approach—blending fundamental global macro positions with a balanced allocation to U.S. equities—has allowed us to generate returns from multiple sources beyond traditional equity exposure. Read more below on our current global macro positioning—short equities, long Treasury notes, and long commodities—which aims to capitalize on shifting global economic dynamics, particularly China’s growing dominance in commodity markets.

As we move forward, our goal remains the same: to provide equity-like returns while managing risk through non-correlated assets. The market backdrop continues to evolve, and our flexible investment process ensures we can adjust positioning as opportunities arise. While historically unconventional, our current strategy anticipates new market patterns emerging amid changing global leadership.

In this month’s commentary, we review the logic behind our positions and the potential for significant market shifts ahead.

Our strategy

Occasionally, it’s important to re-visit who we are and what differentiates us. Writing it down memorializes our vision and refreshes the outside world’s understanding of our approach.

We are attempting to bring back the “classic style of discretionary global macro”. What does this mean?

Returns

  • In the old days (1970s, 1980s), hedge funds, including global macro funds, were expected to be return generators, and not just diversifiers. This meant delivering at least a 10% net return. Today, allocators rely on private equity and venture capital for return generation, and view hedge funds – and particularly macro funds – as lower volatility, diversifying strategies.
  • 40 years ago, classic macro funds generated their return by concentrating their capital into their best ideas, with often only a handful of line items in the portfolio. Today, large macro funds often have over 100 trades in their portfolios, many of which may seem unrelated to one another, but which often tend to become correlated at times of market stress.

Risk

  • Most modern hedge fund strategies (including macro strategies) begin by equating risk with portfolio volatility. They market themselves to allocators by describing the “vol” target they are shooting for. Value-at-risk (VaR) modeling is heavily employed when managing these portfolios.
  • In contrast, we start with drawdowns, targeting 20% peak-to-trough drawdowns and reducing portfolio exposures – often dramatically – during drawdown periods, through a combination of hitting risk limits on individual positions as well as portfolio level P&L triggers. While we review a daily VaR report, this is a secondary, or even tertiary data point in our risk management framework. In line with classic macro risk management principles, we simply reduce position sizing during drawdowns on a position-by-position basis.
  • We acknowledge that a concentrated, classic macro approach such as ours, with a high nominal return target, is both lumpy and higher vol. Indeed, we have no issue with the fact that the vol of the global macro strategy within the Dynamic Alpha Macro Fund (DYMIX) is 20-25% annualized. This is also why we combine passive equity exposure with the global macro strategy within the fund, with the goal of reducing overall volatility.

How to categorize us

  • Many large macro strategies have catered to the evolving landscape of the past 30 years, often championed by consultants and asset allocation models. They have slotted themselves into the “diversifying strategies” box, offering 7% vol strategies that target a mid-single digit long-term compound return. They are properly bucketed as low-vol diversifiers and/or replacements for part of a fixed income portfolio.
  • The goal of the global macro strategy within DYMIX is to be categorized as a return generator – and one with a very low long term correlation to equities, bonds, or other macro strategies due to our unique, concentrated portfolio construction. Again, highlighting why DYMIX targets 50% stocks and 50% global macro allocation. Many investors and advisors allocate to DYMIX from stocks, other alternatives, or a mix of stocks, bonds & alternatives. 

Our current global macro portfolio

In our global macro portfolio, we are short equities, long Treasury notes, and long commodities. 

Based on the last 75 years of economic data, this is a logically incoherent portfolio. It violates relationships that have held since WW2.

  • For example, short stocks and long commodities should not work simultaneously: in a recession where stocks fall, commodities like oil and copper should suffer as well. Indeed, that’s what we’ve seen in e.g. 1990-1991 or 2008-2009.
  • Short stocks and long Treasury notes is consistent with a disinflationary recession: those should work in a weakening U.S. growth environment.
  • Treasuries and commodities don’t really have a consistent relationship so there’s not much to glean here: 2001-2008 was a secular bull market in commodities and a bull market in bonds; the 1970s were a bull market in commodities and a bear market in bonds.

We don’t need all three of these pieces to work out; we do just fine when only half of our ideas pan out. In fact, that’s the norm in macro trading. But what we like about our portfolio is that there is a chance that – for the first time – all three might just be winners simultaneously. The key reason: China has replaced America as the engine of global manufacturing growth.

A bar chart showing sources of increase in annual refined copper consumption growth from 2005 to 2025, segmented by the US, India, China, and the Rest of the World (ROW). The data highlights that China accounted for nearly all of the net increase in copper demand growth leading up to 2025, as indicated by a bold annotation. This visualization supports Dynamic Alpha Macro Fund's strategic focus on global macro trends, including the demand-induced bull market in copper driven by China. The chart emphasizes the fund's macro strategy insights into commodities and copper demand. Dynamic Wealth Group posted this image. Visit https://www.DynamicWG.com.

Source: BCA Research
Note: Calculated as the average annual consumption growth over the past 10 years.

In our February 2025 letter, we shared a chart that showed that copper growth has always taken a hit during U.S. recessions (although our chart only went back to the late 1980s, the relationship holds back to WW2).

We theorized that perhaps, for the first time ever, that relationship was on the verge of breaking down. In the chart above, note that nearly all the world’s growth in copper demand emanates from China today (green bars).

As Europe and China reaccelerate and America slows, short US stocks, long US bonds, and long globally important commodities could all do just fine this year.

Most of the investment research that we read is bearish on copper and silver, since these metals tend to weaken during periods of weak US growth. BCA Research, whom we subscribe to and the firm that produced the chart above, is also tactically bearish on copper due to their belief that much of the run-up in the copper price is due to front-running of Trump’s tariffs. There is some truth to that, as the price of Shanghai copper is weaker than COMEX copper in NY.

However, we believe that China’s growth is turning the corner for the first time in five years, and the price action in both copper and silver is bullish. In addition, a meaningful amount of China’s copper consumption in the last few years has been supplied by US scrap copper, a source that has dried up due to fears of export restrictions and tariffs. A greater demand for virgin copper in China should act as an added catalyst.

Part of our job as portfolio managers is to know when to push back and openly disagree with the research viewpoints we read, no matter how well articulated. For now, we give the benefit of the doubt to the thesis that there is a genuine demand induced bull market in copper and silver.



As always, we continue to be nimble. If the data and/or our views change, we can pivot our positioning and find other trades within the 40+ markets we have available. This is also why we maintain a strategic allocation to U.S. equities in our overall fund strategy, balancing a buy-and-hold approach with active global macro long/short positions.  We appreciate your continued trust and partnership and look forward to updating you on our progress in the coming months.


EQUITY INDICESENERGYMETALS
E-mini NASDAQ
E-Mini Russell 2000
E-mini S&P 500
MSCI EAFE Index
MSCI EM Index
Nikkei 225
Crude oil
Natural gas
NY Harbor ULSD
RBOB Gasoline
Copper
Gold
Palladium
Platinum
Silver

INTEREST RATESCURRENCYAGRICULTURE
SOFR
2-year Treasury note
5-year Treasury note
10-year Treasury note
30-Year Treasury
Australian dollar
Brazilian Real
British pound
Canadian dollar
Euro
Japanese yen
Mexican peso
New Zealand dollar
Swiss Franc
Cocoa
Coffee
Corn
Cotton
Feeder cattle
Lean hogs
Live cattle
Soybean meal
Soybean oil
Soybeans
Sugar #11
Wheat

The list above is not all inclusive.


Disclaimers:

Dynamic Alpha Approach diagram: a circle split into Strategic Equity (growth, broad market, and dividend) and Fundamental Macro (currencies, equities, bonds, energies, metals, and agriculture), combined to pursue Dynamic Alpha. This image was posted by Dynamic Alpha Funds https://www.DynamicAlphaFunds.com
Morningstar 5-Star Overall Rating seal awarded to the Dynamic Alpha Macro Fund (DYMIX). This image was posted by Dynamic Alpha Funds https://www.DynamicAlphaFunds.com

Dynamic Alpha Macro Fund Institutional Class (DYMIX)

Received a 5-Star Overall Morningstar Rating™.

The Overall Morningstar Rating™ is based on the Fund’s risk-adjusted performance among 37 Macro Trading funds for the three-year period ended September 30, 2026.

Get Notified When New Commentaries are Released

You are now entering the
website
Continue